![]() (RFG3 was a huge improvement over RFG2, but RFG4 is a small improvement over RFG3. | It proved to be not very good when i set up my own planes on it. It doesn't affect the flight model much, but if you want the graphics to look good you've got to have the hardware to support it - otherwise you'll have to turn the graphics options way down just to be able to use it. I have tried all the USB ports which work, but still no go. 2 to work I just received my new Real Flight G2 Simulator and have loaded on the software on my Windows 98 system, connected the controller into my USB port, but the amber light will not blink. ![]() Some are better at one thing, and others are better at this other thing, and so which simulator is `the best' will depend on what you're after.Īnd yes, having the appropriate hardware is important. Likes: 1 Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts Help.can't get my Real Flight G2 Gen. Now, all the modern simulators are pretty good, and it's hard to pick one that's `the best'. So they got back to work and eventually put out RFG3, which was a big improvement. Then Reflex XTR (I think that's the one) came out and blew RFG2 out of the water - KnifeEdge had been caught napping. | Ohave G2, If you turned off nost of the 3D and objects, and costruncted | a simple field, it only needed an upgrade that cost as much as the sim | to run it.mostly new video card -) | It is one of the best frankly.Īt the time, RFG2 *was* the very best available. ![]() A friend showed me his |> RealFlight G3.5 simulator and its OK but are there any better?. | Chuck wrote: |> I have been park-flying RTF's for about a year now and still like to |> practice (and play) when it gets dark outside. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |